Hp loadrunner license price

There is also the Enterprise version of the software which allows other features that the Professional does not, such as, license sharing. We are going to continue to use the product in the future, I recommend this product.

There are others available on the market. We use the solution for client service applications, mostly web-based applications. There are a lot of service conversions needed in terms of Apple to Apple talking or using with a protocol. If you need what they're offering then I think LoadRunner is a good tool. And it's from HP. Primary use cases are creating code-based operations for the latest updates, and API calls if we are in corporate.

I think correlation is one of the important features. Correlation, parameterization, those kind of features make things easier. It's a very expensive tool so I think licensing costs could be reduced. I think their monitoring services in real time could be improved and made more user friendly. Their tech support is pretty good.

They try to document things and they are organized. I would say I've had good experience with them. This is a heavy-duty tool, so it's not a one-click installation. But I think it's comparatively easier with the documentation they provide. I would suggest that if you have a site that needs to be used by a lot of people or if it's for enterprise applications where consumption is high, then it's a good tool.

Otherwise, if there are fewer users or not a lot of load, then I would say that other tools might be handy. If you require performance-oriented applications, then it's a good tool. We have several use cases for this solution. One of them is an automobile website for a huge dealership and we are doing load testing for them.

We have projects in the hospitality industry, like hotel bookings. Our projects involve both API testing as well as browser-based load testing. LoadRunner is easy to use. The debugging capability is difficult to use and should be improved. This is one area where some of the other products we use are better. I have been using LoadRunner for five years.

We have been in touch with technical support but not very often. They were helpful when we did contact them. We have used multiple testing tools like Visual Studio and NeoLoad. We have all of these as options. LoadRunner is easier to use and has support for better protocols.

NeoLoad was one of the options that we considered, but we ultimately went with LoadRunner. What we like the most is that it integrates with UC. We use UC for our front-end user experience. It's a more realistic user experience. If they were able to, I would say that the scalability could be improved. If the costs were not as expensive to upgrade, then we would scale it more.

It's a stable solution. In the ten years that we have been using it, I have only had an issue once. We had an issue with the protocol where it didn't support the job. We contacted support. It's a scalable solution but I think that the Enterprise version is more scalable and more manageable. It's fine for us, as we only have a few projects a year. On a larger scale, Enterprise would be better than the Professional edition. Previous versions were easy to install but we struggled with the LoadRunner Enterprise to get it to work.

It was a bit challenging. Sign In. Post Review. Because of that it is relatively expensive. Filter by:. Filter Reviews. Analyst Firm. Cloud Provider. Comms Service Provider. Computer Retailer. Construction Company. Consumer Goods Company. Engineering Company. Financial Services Firm. Healthcare Company. Hospitality Company.

Import And Exporter. Insurance Company. International Affairs Institute. Educational Organization. Legal Firm. Local Government. Logistics Company. Manufacturing Company. Maritime Company. Marketing Services Firm. Media Company. Mining And Metals Company. Non Tech Company. Museum Or Institution. Music Company. Non Profit. Outsourcing Company. Paper And Forest Products. Performing Arts. Photography Company. Political Organization. Printing Company. Program Development Consultancy.

Religious Institution. Security Firm. Computer Software Company. Sports Company. Tech Company. Tech Consulting Company. Tech Services Company. Tech Vendor. Think Tank. Translation And Localization Position. Transportation Company. Wireless Company. Writing And Editing Position. Company Size. Self Employed. Job Level. C Level. Senior Manager. Apache JMeter. Tricentis NeoLoad. Silk Performer. Showing reviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters. Prashant Sarswat. Real User. Very good controller and a market leader, but not cost effective for small business.

Pros and Cons. For a small organization, it is very difficult to sustain the costs involved in having the solution or the related fees". What is our primary use case? The controller is the best feature, in my opinion. The technical support aspect of the solution could be improved. I've been using the solution for five years. My organization continues to use it. The initial setup of the solution was very straightforward, as I recall.

Cloud-based applications can be tested with HP Loadrunner as well. Loadrunner has the capability to run seamlessly and quickly. It can also realistically test loads, including those from different geographic locations. Nowadays, a quick search online can give you all the answers and information you need. A stable Internet connection can help you stream TV shows or even upload your content.

The Internet…. When a business uses multiple non-integrated software systems, inefficiency becomes the order of the day. HP Loadrunner Review.

What is HP Loadrunner? HP Loadrunner is an app loading system that gives users the ability to test their application to identify and prevent problems by immediately detecting and addressing bottlenecks before implementation.

This ensures that the soon-to-be-implemented applications have met performance requirements. Product Quality Score. This SKU will need to be listed multiple times if there are multiple Controllers to be used. All of the licensing we have reviewed thus far is based on perpetual licenses. This means a long-term ownership of the license, with an additional cost for software maintenance and support paid annually.

There are shorter term licensing options for LoadRunner that include daily, 1-month, 3-month, and 1-year terms. The cost for this has the maintenance and support cost built into the product SKU, and is only provided for the duration of usage. Once the term is up, the maintenance and support ends as well.

Keep in mind that the LoadRunner license continues to restrict the usage geographically at the Site level. This means it matters where the software is installed, and from where the software is being accessed. It matters where the person is sitting at using the software, even if they are accessing a terminal remotely. Ensure that your organization has kept detailed inventory on what they own, and which Vusers are on which Controllers.

HP has the right to periodically audit the software install base at any client. I would encourage any organization to stay in compliance. Note: HP does not define what a User is when automating test execution with a Continuous Integration product like Jenkins.

This is one benefit to automating test execution. The new Community edition is a major shift for LoadRunner licensing, and the new licensing model is more flexible by removing the limitation on the number of Controllers.